Legal Opinion

United States v. Ortiz

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 28, 1992No. 67,120; CM 9001665PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

CRAWFORD, Judge:

Appellant was tried in West Berlin before a general court-martial composed of officer members before the collapse of the Berlin Wall. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of committing indecent acts with a child and committing indecent acts with another1, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. He was sentenced to a reprimand, dishonorable discharge, confinement for 8 years, forfeiture of all pay,2 and reduction to Private E-l. The convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as provided for reduction…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. ClarkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. CokeleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. UretaUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. GodfreyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. SirokyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  4. United States v. HarrisUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  5. United States v. DieterArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API