Legal Opinion
United States v. Castillo
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided September 27, 1989No. 59,726; CM 8700719PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
EVERETT, Chief Judge:
A military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial at Fort Eustis, Virginia, tried Castillo on a variety of charges — in-*148eluding rape and forcible sodomy at divers times with a daughter and a stepdaughter. Most of the charges were dismissed by the judge on speedy-trial grounds; and evidence on the merits was received only as to a charge of disobeying an order to avoid contact with certain family members, and as to a charge of soliciting Lisa Gale Sells to commit sodomy, in violation of Articles 90 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. RemaiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. William T. Panza, United States of America v. John TatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- United States v. HumpherysCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. TanksleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. RuppelCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.