Legal Opinion

United States v. American Chicle Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 24, 1920No. 2014PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8293 (T. D. 38153). lOral argument Feb. 24,1920, by’Mr. Lawrence and Mr. WiDne.)

1Opinion of the CourtDeVries, Judge

The merchandise is chicle. The concededly representative sample of the importation, which was made at the port of Detroit, consists of small portions of chicle pronouncedly intermixed with particles of dirt, bark, sticks, and other foreign substances. The record discloses .that the shipment originated in Mexico, was first taken to Toronto, Canada, whereat it was bruised or hammered from larger into smaller particles, in part resacked, and thereupon imported into the United States at the port of Detroit. The collector at that port assessed duty thereupon at the rate of 20 . cents per pound…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. Sheldon & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  3. American Chicle Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Togasaki v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. R. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  4. Union Carbide Int'l Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. Fynaut v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API