Legal Opinion
Baldwin v. Fresno City Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 1954No. Civ. 4687PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in a mandamus proceeding in which she petitioned for a writ to compel the respondents to classify and employ her as a permanent teacher of respondent school district.
Appellant was employed by the Fresno Unified School District as a probationary teacher in the day school for the 1945-1946, 1946-1947 and 1947-1948 school years. On Hay 10, 1948,. she was notified by a letter signed by the superintendent of schools that her name would be omitted from the list of teachers to be presented to the board of education for reelection. This letter was sent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chambers v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Kimberlin v. Los Angeles City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Knickerbocker v. Redlands High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Hogsett v. Beverly Hills School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Steele v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Peralta Federation of Teachers Local 1603 v. Peralta Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Vittal v. Long Beach Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Pena v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Curtis v. San Mateo Junior College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.