Legal Opinion
Kimberlin v. Los Angeles City High School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 22, 1953No. Civ. 19156PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
By this proceeding in mandamus, petitioner Kimberlin seeks to compel the respondents to reinstate him in a teaching position; classify him as a permanent employee, and pay him alleged accumulated salary.
Petitioner is a certificated teacher of wood shop, and served in that capacity for the school years 1948-1949 and 1949-1950 under the classification of probationary employee.
“The school year begins on the first day of July and ends on the last day of June.” (Ed. Code, § 8101.) In the Los Angeles District, the probationary period is two complete consecutive years; hence at the beginning of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hunt v. Mayor & Council of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Fry v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Hayman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- La Shells v. HenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Ertman v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Munns v. StenmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Rudolph v. Athletic CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Flaherty v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.