Legal Opinion
Curtis v. San Mateo Junior College District
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1972No. Civ. 30357PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (H. C.), J.
This is an appeal from the denial of a writ of mandate. The appellant teacher contends that he fulfilled the three-year requirement of Education Code section 13304 by combining service in the regular junior college day school with service in the evening adult school.
We agree with appellant.
Appellant was first employed as a probationary teacher for the 1967-1968 school year and continued in this capacity for three consecutive school years. However, for the first half of appellant’s first year as a probationary teacher he taught in the day schools of the district and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holbrook v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Cullen v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Anderson v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Beseman v. RemyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Baldwin v. Fresno City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
3Cited by6 opinions
- Balen v. Peralta Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Santa Barbara Federation of Teachers, Local 1081 v. Santa Barbara High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Kalina v. San Mateo Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Haase v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Deglow v. Bd. of Trs. of Los Rios Cmty. Coll. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.