Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Steele v. Board of Trustees

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1932No. Docket No. 8121PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturteyant, J.

Heretofore the petitioners were employed as probationary teachers by the Board of Trustees of the Pittsburg School District. Prior to the tenth day of June, 1931, the clerk of the district deposited in the mails of the United States written communications directed to the petitioners advising the petitioners that their services would not be needed during the ensuing year. Said letters were actually received by the petitioners prior to the tenth day of June, 1931. Claiming the dismissal to be ineffectual, the petitioners applied for a writ of mandate directing their reinstatement. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heinlen v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Spreckels v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Blalock v. RidgwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Morrissey v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Couthway v. BerghausSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Knickerbocker v. Redlands High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Crummer v. WhiteheadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Hankla v. Governing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Volandri v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API