Legal Opinion

Hogsett v. Beverly Hills School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 1936No. Civ. 9846PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

Petitioner’s case was presented to the trial court upon an agreed statement of facts. Having served in the schools of Beverly Hills School District for three complete consecutive school years, from 1929 to 1932, as a probationary teacher of music, that being a position requiring certification qualifications, and having been employed thereafter as a substitute teacher, petitioner claims the right to classification as a permanent employee, under the provisions of the School Code of California (secs. 5.500 ct seq.). This classification was denied to her by the board of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wood v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Smith v. School District No. 18Montana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Matthews v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Beseman v. RemyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Gerritt v. Fullerton Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API