Legal Opinion

Butte Northern Copper Co. v. Radmilovich

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1909No. 2,620PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from, District Court, Silver Bow County; Geo. M. Bourquin, Judge. Consolidated Actions by the Butte Northern Copper Company against John Radmilovich, and John Stepan against the same defendant. Defendant appeals in each case from a judgment for plaintiff, from an order denying a new trial, and from an order amending the judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

In July, 1906, John Radmilovich made application in the United States land office at Helena, Montana, for a patent to the *159Balkan quartz lode mining claim. The Butte Northern Copper Company and John Stepan filed adverse claims, claiming a portion of the ground under their location of the Stepan No. 2 claim, and another portion under their location of the Minnesota claim. Their adverse claims were allowed in the land office, and within thirty days afterwards they commenced two actions against Radmilovich, one based upon each of their claims. The defendant answered, putting in issue most of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. GlennMontana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Sanders v. NobleMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Milwaukee Gold Extraction Co. v. GordonMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Orr v. HaskellMontana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Dolan v. PassmoreMontana Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Forquer v. NorthMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. First State Bank v. LarsenMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Anaconda Co. v. WhittakerMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Mitchell v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Brunnabend v. TibblesMontana Supreme Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API