Legal Opinion

Milwaukee Gold Extraction Co. v. Gordon

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1908No. 2,487PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Granite County; Geo. B. Winston, Judge. Action by the Milwaukee Gold Extraction Company against George W. Gordon and another. From a judgment for defendants and an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Granite County; Geo. B. Winston, Judge. Action by the Milwaukee Gold Extraction Company against George W. Gordon and another. From a judgment for defendants and an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals. The statement in defendants’ answer that, not having sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the incorporation of plaintiff, they deny the allegation of the complaint relative thereto, does not conform to the language of section 690, Code of Civil Procedure, and consequently is no denial at all. (State v. Butte City Water Co., 18 Mont. 199,…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

This is an adverse suit instituted by the Milwaukee Gold Extraction Company, a corporation, owning the Hannah, Alice and Dixie quartz lode mining claims, all situate in Granite county, against the defendants Gordon and Doddington, the owners of the Maude S. claim. It is alleged in the complaint that the defendants made application for patent to their claim, and during the period of publication of their notice plaintiff filed in the local land office its protest and adverse claim, alleging a conflict between the surface area of defendants’ claim and the surface areas of the claims owned by the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Finnegan v. NoerenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Oroville & Va. R.R. v. Supervisors of Plumas Cty.California Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Strepey v. StarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  5. Martin v. CorscaddenMontana Supreme Court · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pengelly v. PeelerMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Mitchell v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Butte Northern Copper Co. v. RadmilovichMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Snowy Peak Mining Co. v. Tamarack & Chesapeak Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Harvey E. Mack Co. v. RyanMontana Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API