Legal Opinion

Anaconda Co. v. Whittaker

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1980No. 14925PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

This is an action involving the conflicting mining claims of Morton K. Whittaker and the Anaconda Company. Whittaker appeals from a judgment entered in the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Sweet Grass County, in favor of Anaconda. Under the judgment, Anaconda is entitled to the possession and enjoyment of the area covered by its Eve 62 and Eve 69 mining claims which conflict with Whittaker’s Pine mining claim. Whittaker also appeals from a denial of his motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

Whittaker located the Pine claim on October 1, 1950. Anaconda, on the other hand,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strong v. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Ferris v. McNallyMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Butte Northern Copper Co. v. RadmilovichMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Thornton v. KaufmanMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Upton v. LarkinMontana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Britton v. Farmers Insurance GroupMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Bottrell v. American BankMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Weinberg v. Farmers State Bank of WordenMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Sizemore v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Lindquist v. MoranMontana Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API