Legal Opinion

Orr v. Haskell

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Third District, Lewis a/nd Clarice County.

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

The respondents move to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the same has been taken from a non-appealable order. A judgment was entered for the respondents in March, 1872, but the blank which was left therein for the amount of the costs and disbursements was not filled by the clerk of the court below until March, 1875. Afterward, an execution was issued and the appellant filed motions to quash the same and re-tax the costs. The motions were overruled and the appellant appealed *351from the orders of the court thereon. No appeal has been taken from the judgment, and there is no statement on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chapin & Mastick v. BroderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Gilman v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Dooly v. NortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Burnham v. HaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Lind v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Arnold v. JoinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. State v. StoneMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. First State Bank v. LarsenMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Barnett v. BohannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Butte Northern Copper Co. v. RadmilovichMontana Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API