Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. Glenn

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Silver Daw County. STATEMENT. This was an action,' bronght in the District Court of Silver Bow County, by the plaintiff, Dennis O’Donnell, against the defendants, John Glenn, John B. Cameron, Sahína H. Hale, George F. Hale, Alfred W. Hale, and Michael McNamee, who had made application in the United States land office at Helena, Montana, for a patent to certain mining ground, located as the “Argonaut Lode,” which was in conflict with a location…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court, Silver Daw County. STATEMENT. This was an action,' bronght in the District Court of Silver Bow County, by the plaintiff, Dennis O’Donnell, against the defendants, John Glenn, John B. Cameron, Sahína H. Hale, George F. Hale, Alfred W. Hale, and Michael McNamee, who had made application in the United States land office at Helena, Montana, for a patent to certain mining ground, located as the “Argonaut Lode,” which was in conflict with a location known as the “Slap Jack Lode,” under which O’Donnell claimed a portion of the same ground. The plaintiff filed an…

1Opinion of the CourtMcConnell, C. J.

This is an action brought under section 2326 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, for the purpose of determining the right to the mining claim described in the appellant’s complaint. There is no statement on appeal, nor statement on motion for a new trial, nor are the instructions *251made a part of the judgment roll by bill of exceptions or otherwise. The case must be heard here upon the judgment roll, and the only controverted question presented by it is the admissibility of certain testimony, and of the declaratory statement offered by the respondents. The appellant claims the lode…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clinton v. EnglebrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Swan v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Stout v. HyattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  4. Hoyt v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Williams v. Bank of MichiganCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Butte & Superior Copper Co. v. Clark-Montana Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Metcalf v. PrescottMontana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Purdum v. LaddinMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Butte & Superior Copper Co. v. Clark-Montana Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  5. Gamer v. GlennMontana Supreme Court · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API