Legal Opinion

In Re Perez

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 2003No. 02-BG-660PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This case arises from Respondent’s representation of Mr. Raul Martinez with respect to immigration matters. The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”), having adopted and incorporated the findings of fact and conclusions of law of a Hearing Committee, and having reviewed and modified the Hearing Committee’s recommended sanction, 1 has recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of sixty days for protracted neglect and intentional conduct that resulted in prejudice and damage to a vulnerable client. The Board adopted the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In re DubowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. In re HagosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. In re Laurence F. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. In Re FitzgeraldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. In Re OwusuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. In Re RostokerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API