Legal Opinion
In re Hagos
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 17, 1992No. 92-SP-88PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility, in agreement with the findings and recommendation of a Hearing Committee, has recommended that respondent be disbarred for misappropriation and dishonest handling of a client’s funds over a period of several years. See In re Thompson, 579 A.2d 218 (D.C.1990); In re Addams, 579 A.2d 190 (D.C.1990) (en banc). Respondent did not appear at the hearing conducted by the Hearing Committee; submitted no briefs to the Hearing Committee or the Board on Professional Responsibility; and has filed no brief with this court. For the reasons stated by the Board in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re HarrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Matter of BuckleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re PerezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997