Legal Opinion
In re Laurence F. Johnson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 4, 2017No. 16-BG-777PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Steadman, Senior Judge:
Respondent, Laurence F. Johnson, was charged by Disciplinary Counsel with multiple violations of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (MLRPC). 1 Respondent is an experienced immigration attorney and the violations in question stem from two separate immigration matters. On appeal, respondent claims that the Board on Professional Responsibility (1) misapplied D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 11 (c) in recommending independent discipline in a matter for which respondent had already been disciplined by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (AGCM), and (2)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re HoldmannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re ScanioDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re PerrinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Catherine E. AbbeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- In re Sean Gardner SaxonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- In Re Tilman L. GeraldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In re ChapmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- In re Dobbie & In re TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.