Legal Opinion
In Re Owusu
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 10, 2005No. 04-BG-916PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
The Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board), having found that respondent Jacob Q. Owusu committed serious neglect of an immigration matter, has recommended his suspension from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for sixty days, and that he be ordered to pay restitution and required to prove fitness to practice as a condition of reinstatement. Owusu has not participated in these disciplinary proceedings at any stage. Bar Counsel, for her part, excepts only to the Board’s recommendation that an additional charge of violation of Rule 8.4(d), based…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HallmarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re HopkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re CorizziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re FitzgeraldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009