Legal Opinion
In Re Rostoker
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 2007No. 04-BG-1388PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
This matter began as an original disciplinary investigation of respondent, Michael Rostoker, based upon his federal convictions. Respondent was suspended on November 22, 2004, and the matter was referred to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) for a recommendation of sanction and a determination of whether any of the convictions involved crimes of moral turpitude. Specifically, respondent was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Northern California for conspiracy, travel with intent to engage in sexual acts with a minor, using facilities of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re DayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re PerezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re SharpDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re WortzelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re WeaverDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re LandfieldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re WittenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008