Legal Opinion

Rotea v. Izuel

California Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1939No. L. A. 16282PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPENCE, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff brought this action against the defendant executor of the last will and testament of Antonio Izuel, deceased, seeking to recover upon a rejected claim for the alleged reasonable value of services rendered to Eugenia Izuel, the sister of said Antonio Izuel, deceased. Plaintiff had judgment for the sum of $9,000 and from said judgment, defendant appeals.

There was but little conflict in the evidence and a brief summary of the facts will suffice. One of the sisters of the deceased, who had married plaintiff, died many yeare ago leaving five minor children as the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Long v. RumseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. McClenahan v. KeyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hasbrook v. WingateOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Batt v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Earhart v. William Low Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Julius Roehrs Co. v. DIV. OF TAX APPEALS, DEPT. OF TREASURYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API