Earhart v. William Low Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
In this case we must determine whether a party who expends funds and performs services at the request of another, under the reasonable belief that the requesting party will compensate him for such services, may recover in quantum meruit although the expenditures and services do not directly benefit property owned by the requesting party.
In the instant case, plaintiff asserts that, at defendant’s request, he expended sums in commencing the construction of a mobile home park on land owned by defendant and on an adjacent parcel owned by a third party. When defendant refused to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Raedeke v. Gibraltar Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Scala v. Jerry Witt & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Coleman Engineering Co. v. North American Aviation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re De Laurentiis Entertainment Group Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Debtor. Carolco Television Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Voris v. LampertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Day v. ALTA BATES MEDICAL CENTERCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- In Re Marriage of BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Transnational Corp. v. Rodio & Ursillo, Ltd., Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.