Legal Opinion

Long v. Rumsey

California Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1938No. L. A. 16445PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNARD, J., pro tem.

This is an action for the reasonable value of services alleged to have been performed by the plaintiff, a claim therefor having been filed with the executor of the estate of Ida Pricke and rejected.

Ida Pricke and her husband, August Pricke, ran a bakery in Los Angeles, and lived in the same building. A cousin of Mrs. Pricke, Meta Klatt, who was then seventeen years of age, arrived in Los Angeles on March 23, 1913, and thereafter, for a period of about six years, lived with the Frickes and assisted them in the work of the bakery and the home. She was married to a Mr. Long…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Spinney v. DowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Ruinello v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Huskinson & Brown, Limited Liability Partnership v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Tabata v. MuraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Lazzarevich v. LazzarevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API