Legal Opinion
Frisco Land & Mining Co. v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 7, 1977No. Civ. 39320PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff the owner of a 650-acre subdivision, substantially all of which was embraced within the permit area of the coastal zone created by the California Coastal Zone Conservation Act of 1972 (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 27000-27650, particularly §§ 27100 and 27104), has appealed from an order granting the defendant State of California’s motion for summary judgment and the judgment entered thereon. The plaintiff sought damages 2 in inverse condemnation claiming that its land was taken by the state through the acts and omissions of the North Central Coast Regional…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Smith v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- State Ex Rel. SCA Chemical Waste Services, Inc. v. KonigsbergTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
- Whaler's Village Club v. Califonia Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Taper v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Helix Land Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.