Legal Opinion
Taper v. City of Long Beach
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 8, 1982No. Civ. 21589PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
These are appeals from judgments in coordinated fictions in eminent domain and inverse condemnation.
Procedural History
On February 7, 1977, Sydney Mark Taper as testamentary trustee of the Barry Hugh Taper Trust, later joined as a party plaintiff by Barry Hugh Taper (collectively the Tapers), filed an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court against the City of Long Beach (City) seeking damages for inverse condemnation, for unreasonable delay in instituting eminent domain proceedings and other oppressive conduct, and for breach of statutory duty under Government Code sections…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Smith v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Border Business Park, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Grant v. List & LathropCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Berge v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.