Helix Land Co. v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STANIFORTH, J.
We confront here the single issue of whether Helix Land Company (Helix), owners of land in the Tia Juana River Valley, can state a cause of action in inverse condemnation or nuisance against defendants City of San Diego, its counsel and certain of its officers (City), and/or the State of California, its Secretary of the Resources Agency and Director of State Parks (State) for their various actions or inactions in land use control which, Helix argues, resulted in the deprivation of all economic use of their property.
Helix’s 13-count complaint sought damages and equitable…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Marina Tenants Ass'n v. Deauville Marina Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Jordan v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Coopers & Lybrand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Abari v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.