Legal Opinion
B & P Construction Co. v. Wells
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 23, 1988No. 62508PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DOOLIN, Chief Justice.
The single issue presented on appeal is whether a party who prevails at trial and is statutorily entitled to an award of attorney fees is also entitled to recover attorney fees for prevailing on appeal. We answer affirmatively.
B & P Construction Company [B & P] brought an action in District Court to recover for goods and services provided under an oral contract to Paul Wells, d/b/a Paul Wells Construction Company [Wells], and JOB Construction Company, Inc. [JOB]. JOB was the prime contractor for two State highway construction projects and Wells was the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- City National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Osburn v. Bendix Home Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Wieland v. Danner Auto Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Hamilton v. Telex Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Kay v. Venezuelan Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Rout v. Crescent Public Works AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Sooner Builders & Investments, Inc. v. Nolan Hatcher Construction Services, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Aircraft Equipment Co. v. Kiowa Tribe of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.