Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Telex Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 3, 1981No. 52524PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice:

The principal questions here discussed relate to whether appellants owe the lawyer-appellee an attorney fee for information furnished them, pursuant to contract, as to the identity and location of a debtor of whose account they had no sufficient record and whether, in the process of collecting that fee he may recover additional fees for members of his law firm and himself for efforts expended, at both trial and appellate levels and stages, in attempting to collect the original fee, and as to whether the services were necessary and the amounts awarded are reasonable. We…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. International Security Life Insurance Co. v. SprayTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Oliver's Sports Center, Inc. v. National Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Brandt v. ImperoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  5. Weaver v. LaubSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Spencer v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Root v. KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Smith v. BatchelorUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. GRP of Texas, Inc. v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API