Legal Opinion
Sooner Builders & Investments, Inc. v. Nolan Hatcher Construction Services, L.L.C.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 19, 2007No. 103,167PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
T1 The question presented in this appeal is whether the district court erred when it ordered Nolan Hatcher Construction Services, L.L.C., defendant/appellant (Hatcher), to pay prevailing party attorney fees and expenses to Sooner Builders & Investments, Inc., plaintiff/appellee (Sooner), after the arbitrator denied all requests for attorney fees and directed each party to pay one-half of the arbitration expenses. We answer in the negative. We affirm the district court.
I. The Proceedings Below
T2 In March of 2004, Sooner filed this contract action against Hatcher in the district court in Tulsa…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gladstone v. Bartlesville Independent School District No. 30Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- SIGNATURE LEASING LLC v. BUYER'S GROUP LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- ANTINI v. ANTINISupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- City of Tulsa v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 93Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- Amundsen v. WrightCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- ANTINI v. ANTINISupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.