Legal Opinion

Lyerly v. North Carrolina State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee CüRiam.

As stated in petitioners’ brief, their allegations herein “are substantially identical with those” in the companion case of Sherrill v. Highway Commission, ante, 643, 142 S.E. 2d 653. Petitioners alleged they, as lessees, operated a grocery store in the Sherrill building on South Center Street, Statesville, N. C., and that, on account of the destruction of the south wall of said building on October 14, 1959, (1) their stock of goods was damaged, (2) they incurred extra expense, and (3) they lost profits, to their damage in the aggregate amount of $2,800.00.

In Midgett v. Highway…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Williams v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Sherrill v. N. C. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Advert. of Charlotte Ltd. P'shipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  3. Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Adver. of Charlotte Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Advert. of Charlotte Ltd. P'shipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  5. Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Advert. of Charlotte Ltd. P'shipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API