Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
In order to decide this appeal, it is necessary to consider and construe G.S. 60-43. Although this statute has been repealed and substantially re-enacted as G.S. 62-224, it was in effect when the work was done. G.S. 60-43 until repealed and substantially re-enacted, subsequent to this litigation, read as follows:
“Whenever, in their construction, the works of any railroad corporation shall cross established roads or ways, the corporation shall so construct its works as not to impede the passage or transportation of persons or property along the same. If any railroad corporation shall so…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Smith v. HefnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Council v. Dickerson's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Sale v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- Davis v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Hinson v. United Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Volumetrics Medical Imaging, Inc. v. ATL Ultrasound, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.