Legal Opinion

Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Advert. of Charlotte Ltd. P'ship

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 2017No. 206PA16PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

**103In this appeal, we consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court's order addressing the appropriate measure of damages in a condemnation action. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT) condemned a leasehold interest held by Adams Outdoor Advertising of Charlotte Limited Partnership (Adams Outdoor). Adams Outdoor owned a billboard situated on the leasehold and rented out space on the billboard to advertisers. At the time of the taking, the billboard did not conform to city or state regulations, but Adams Outdoor held permits…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. BiberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Alamo Land & Cattle Co. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. N.C. Dep't of Transp. v. Mission Battleground Park, DSTSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Finkel v. Palm Park, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2020
  3. Lake v. State Health Plan for Tchrs. & State Emps.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  4. Lake v. State Health Plan for Tchrs. and State Emps.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  5. O'Neal v. BurleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API