Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Advert. of Charlotte Ltd. P'ship
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Justice HUDSON concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I agree with the majority that Article 9 and not 11 of N.C.G.S. Chapter 136 governs in this condemnation proceeding. I also agree with the majority's analysis regarding the permits, the lease extensions, and most of its approach to the bonus value method. I disagree with the majority's analysis regarding whether the billboard and the lost income may properly be considered in the valuation of just compensation under Article 9. Accordingly, I would affirm in part, modify and affirm in part, and reverse in part the decision of the Court of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wilson v. McLeod Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Little v. National Service Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Proctor v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.