Legal Opinion

Harris v. Carter

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1977No. 7617SC733PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Plaintiff first assigns error to the denial of her motion for summary judgment. Pointing to the entry of default against defendant McNeil, plaintiff’s counsel state in their brief that “[i]t is the contention of the plaintiff that since liability has been established against one alleged partner, all that is neces sary to establish the liability of the remaining partners individually is to establish the partnership.” They then point to certain facts stated in depositions of McNeil, his wife, his son, and of plaintiff which they assert establish the existence of a partnership…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. United States v. Gordon C. Borchardt, Charles Oran MensikCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  3. Rawleigh, Moses & Co. v. Capital City Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bell v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. McLain v. Taco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Peebles v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Hudson v. AshleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Leonard v. PughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API