Legal Opinion

Harlow v. Voyager Communications V

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 9, 1998No. 612PA97PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether the Court of Appeals erred in vacating the trial court’s order entering a default against defendant Voyager Communications V (Voyager). Specifically, we must determine whether a final judgment on the merits can be made separately against one defendant who is in default when there are multiple defendants who are alleged to be jointly and severally liable. This is an issue of first impression for this Court.

This case initially arose out of a claim of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by plaintiffs, Richard and Jane Harlow, against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. In Re Uranium Antitrust Litigation. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. Leonard v. PughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Moore v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Harlow v. Voyager Communications VCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McLain v. Taco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Hartwell v. MahanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. College Road Animal Hospital, PLLC v. CottrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. Grier ex rel. Brown v. GuyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. In Re DaqCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API