Legal Opinion

Eddy v. Eddy

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1944No. Civ. 14483PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

The question for decision is whether that part of an interlocutory decree awarding plaintiff $100 per month is erroneous, in view of the absence from the prayer of the complaint of any demand for support money.

The appeal comes here on the judgment roll. The only documents contained are the following: (1) demurrer to complaint; (2) stipulation that the original complaint be withdrawn and the amended complaint filed; (3) the amended complaint; (4) order for default; (5) minute order for judgment; (6) interlocutory decree; (7) notice of appeal; (8) request for transcript.

The amended complaint is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Darsie v. DarsieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Staacke v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Craft v. CraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Majors v. MajorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Cushman v. CushmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Hosner v. SkellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API