Legal Opinion
Banks v. Office of Senate Sergeant-At-Arms
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 5, 2004No. Civ.A. No. 03-56HHK/JMFPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Introduction
This is a Title VII action against the Office of the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms.
*3During the course of the deposition of a witness named Alvin Macon, plaintiffs counsel posed four questions to which objection was made. As the matter now stands, defendant’s counsel has withdrawn the objection to two of the four questions and the dispute centers on the remaining two questions. This dispute has now generated 78 pages of pleadings or 39 pages per question. That must the break old record. Since there has been so much heat and so…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Tax Analysts v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Clifton Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- William M. Brinton v. Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
- Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Loftin v. BandeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Banks v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms & DoorkeeperCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Banks v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms & DoorkeeperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.