Legal Opinion

Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 4, 2009No. 05-CV-329-GKF-PJCPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL J. CLEARY, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the Court is the Plaintiff State of Oklahoma’s (“Oklahoma”) Motion for Sanctions Directed to the Cargill Defendants (“Cargill”) for Discovery Misconduct (Dkt.# 2459). A hearing on Plaintiff’s motion was held on September 25, 2009.

Oklahoma seeks sanctions against Cargill for withholding and misrepresenting the existence of the contents of a Summary of Cargill Grower Farming Operation (“Grower Summary”) and a chart of the frequency and amounts of Cargill grower land application within the Illinois River Watershed (“IRW”)…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. Fidelity Management & Research Co. v. Actuate Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  4. West v. Lake State Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  5. Atchison v. City of Tulsa, OklahomaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2023

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API