Legal Opinion
Banks v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms & Doorkeeper
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 23, 2006No. Nos. Civ.A. 03-56 (HHK/JMF), Civ.A. 03-686 (HHK/JMF), Civ.A. 03-2080 (HHK/JM)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
These consolidated cases were referred to me by Judge Kennedy for full case management. Currently pending before me is the issue of whether defendant, the Office of the Senate Sergeant^at-Arms and Doorkeeper (the “SSA”), must produce certain documents claimed to be privileged and submitted for in camera review pursuant to my November 1, 2005 order. See Banks v. Office of the Senate *19Sergeant-at-Arms, No. 03-56 (D.D.C. Nov. 1, 2005) (order). For the reasons stated herein, I find that most, but not all, of the documents are shielded from…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Tax Analysts v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Towne Place Condo. Ass'n v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Disability Rights Council v. Washington Metropolitan Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Miller v. HolzmannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Miller v. HolzmannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.