Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 27, 2016No. Misc. No. 2009-0564PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
G. MICHAEL HARVEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This case is before the Court on remand from the Court of Appeals. The Court is tasked with deciding, consistent with the guidance from the D.C. Circuit, whether certain documents created by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subpoenaed by the Federal Trade Commission are protected by either the work-product doctrine, the attorney-client privilege, or both. The Court has reviewed m camera all the documents at issue. Upon review, the Court concludes that most of the documents are mere fact work product and are…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tax Analysts v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Clark v. Evergreen Moneysource Mortgage CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- English v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.