Legal Opinion

Madera Police Officers Assn. v. City of Madera

California Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1984No. S.F. 24665PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REYNOSO, J.

We granted hearing to determine whether police officers, sergeants and dispatchers are entitled, as a result of the limitations placed on their mealtime periods, to payment for overtime hours worked. That entitlement depends on whether their lunch and dinner hours are considered worktime, inasmuch as the City of Madera mandates overtime pay for those police department employees who work in excess of the normal eight-hour day and forty-hour week. We conclude that the constraints placed on the activities and conduct of the concerned employees during their mealtime are so…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Longshore v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Los Angeles Fire & Police Protective League v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Cristmat, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Fowler v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Augustus v. ABM Security ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Tan v. Grubhub, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  5. Mendiola v. CPS Security Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2015

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API