Legal Opinion
Fowler v. State Personnel Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 27, 1982No. Civ. 6239PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, Acting P. J.—
Statement of the Case
On May 14, 1981, Superior Court Judge Richard C. Kirkpatrick issued a judgment and a peremptory writ of mandate commanding the State Personnel Board (hereinafter the appellant or the board) to set aside its decision dated May 27, 1980, denying compensation to respondent, a traffic officer with the California Highway Patrol (hereinafter CHP) for the one-half hour lunch period of each working shift.
Respondent had filed a grievance with the CHP concerning compensation for lunch hours. He contended he worked during his half-hour lunch period each…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Glenn L. Martin Nebraska Co. v. CulkinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Garzoli v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Los Angeles Fire & Police Protective League v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Retirement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Madera Police Officers Assn. v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- California Ass'n of Highway Patrolmen v. Department of Personnel AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Madera Police Officers Assn. v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984