Legal Opinion
Los Angeles Fire & Police Protective League v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1972No. Civ. 37928PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, J.
Plaintiff, League, sued in three counts on behalf of all uniformed police officers against the City of Los Angeles and Police Chief Davis to determine the rights of the police officers to compensatory pay including overtime for 45-minute lunch periods (known as “Code 7” time) under Los Angeles City Ordinance number 137,042.
A trial was had and the court found that “Code 7” time is on-duty time by reason of the restraints and obligations placed on uniformed police officers during that period and that the police officers were entitled to corn*71pensation for 22Vz minutes of their…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Wang v. Chinese Daily News, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Madera Police Officers Assn. v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Glade v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Prendergast v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.