Legal Opinion
Cristmat, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 24, 1971No. Civ. 37107PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHWEITZER, J.
This case presents the question of the constitutionality of section 2648 of Los Angeles County Ordinance No. 5860. Ordinance No. 5860 provides for the licensing of model studios and specifies certain conditions under which such studios must operate. A model studio is described generally as an establishment that provides human models, often nude, for professional and amateur photographers. For an admission fee the photographer is allowed to take pictures of a professional model in a room provided for that purpose.
Section 2648 provides: “A person shall not enter, be or…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- In Re GianniniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Galvan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Crownover v. MusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Madera Police Officers Assn. v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Oakland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Korean American Legal Advocacy Foundation v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Sonoma County Board of Education v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.