Legal Opinion
Howard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 6, 1937No. Civ. No. 1794PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages. A demurrer to their first amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend and the judgment under attack here was entered against them. The only question presented is the bar of the statute of limitations to the cause of action.
The pertinent allegations of the first amended complaint may be thus summarized: That on November 10, 1932, plaintiffs were owners of real property in the city of Los Angeles, and Harry E. Weaver and Jean C. Weaver, his wife, were owners of real property in Tulare County; that by a written lease dated June 1,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lattin v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Chipman v. Morill & WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Overton v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Gallagher v. California Pacific Title & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Amen v. Merced County Title Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Simons v. EdouardeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Shumaker v. RippyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Simmons v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958