Chipman v. Morill & Webster
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District. This action was commenced on the thirtieth day of July, A. D. 1860. All other material facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.
The property of the plaintiff was sold under execution to satisfy a judgment recovered against the plaintiff and the defendants, and this action is brought to enforce payment from the defendants of their proportionate share. The questions for determination arise upon the pleadings. The papers read on the motion for new trial we cannot look into, as there is no appeal from the order denying the motion. The complaint sets forth that in December, 1853, the plaintiff and the defendants purchased certain real estate situated in Alameda county, and gave to the vendor in part payment for the same…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Campbell v. MesierNew York Court of Chancery · 1819
- Lapham v. BarnesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1828
- Babcock v. HubbardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1818
- Couch v. Terry's Adm'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
3Cited by45 opinions
- International Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- Faires v. CockerellTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.