Legal Opinion

Shumaker v. Rippy

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1956No. Civ. 21350PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

The question for decision is whether the court below correctly awarded a summary judgment under Code of Civil Procedure, section 437c, in an action for damages based upon the negligence of an escrow agent.

On January 6, 1955, appellant Shumaker filed an action for breach of. contract of escrow for the sale of certain real property to one Burton L. Lamb, wherein the respondent Rippy was escrow agent. It was alleged that the respondent failed to pay over the net proceeds of such sale and thereby breached the terms of the escrow agreement. The second cause of action alleged additionally that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lattin v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Howard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Amen v. Merced County Title Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Walker v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Fisher v. MacInnessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Simmons v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API