Legal Opinion

Laudermilk v. Carpenter

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1969No. 39296PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ennis, J. †

This is an appeal from a tort action in which a minor boy was denied recovery, for serious burns sustained in defendants’ backyard. (Henceforth defendants will be referred to in the singular.)

A brief background of the facts are: On January 4, 1964 Steven Laudermilk, then age 4, was burned severely while playing in the backyard of his friend, Michael Carpenter. The fire had been started in an incinerator by Mr. Carpenter’s older son, Tony, then age 6. Mr. Carpenter had instructed his son on burning the trash in the backyard and often left Tony to supervise the fire. On this occasion…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Potts v. AmisWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Gordon v. Deer Park School District No. 414Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Schock v. Ringling Bros. Etc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Bjork v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Jenkins v. Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Shannon v. Pay 'N Save Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Balandzich v. DemerotoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. Kjellman v. RichardsWashington Supreme Court · 1973

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API