State v. Ryan
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C.J.
Hearsay statements of child victims of sexual abuse are conditionally admissible in criminal trials under RCW 9A.44.120. Defendant (appellant) John Ryan was convicted in Okanogan County of two counts of indecent liberties in a trial where hearsay statements of the two alleged victims were admitted under this statutory exception to the hearsay rule. Division Three of the Court of Appeals certified to this court the question whether RCW 9A.44.120 violates the confrontation clauses of the state and federal constitutions. The admission of the statements did not comply with the statute's…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by270 opinions
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SwanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
265 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.