Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1986No. 51118-7PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

The Jenkins, plaintiffs below, appeal an additur by the trial judge after a jury verdict which he found to be based on passion and prejudice. In support of their appeal they claim error in the admission of three items of evidence: the deposition of a child, testimony regarding parental negligence, and a video reenactment of the accident. Respondents cross-appeal from the judge's removal of the issue of parental negligence from the jury and his grant of an additur without the alternative of a new trial. We grant a new trial inasmuch as the trial judge erred as a matter of law in admitting the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Smith v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Borst v. BorstWashington Supreme Court · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. John Doe v. Puget Sound Blood CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. C.J.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API