Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1967No. 38621PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver, J. —

Defendant’s appeal presents three questions. They spring from his trial and his jury conviction of the crime of taking indecent liberties on the person of a 6-year-old female child.

Defendant urges that the trial court erred when it admitted into evidence the testimony of the 6-year-old prosecuting witness and when it refused to strike her testimony. RCW 5.60.050 provides in part:

Who are incompetent. The following persons shall not be competent to testify:(2) Children under ten years of age, who appear incapable of receiving just impressions of the facts, respecting which they are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State v. RidleyWashington Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. State v. SwanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. C.J.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Jenkins v. Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. English v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API