Legal Opinion
Oklahoma City v. Vahlberg
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 2, 1939No. 29186PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying an application for an injunction to restrain a tax resale for delinquent paving assessments. The validity of the resale in so far as it is for delinquent ad valorem taxes is not questioned.
The injunction was sought by the city of Oklahoma City, intervening in an action by certain bondholders against the county treasurer of Oklahoma county. The action by the bondholders is not involved herein. The county treasurer filed his answer to the city’s petition in intervention and the case was tried largely upon stipulated facts.
From the judgment denying the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moore v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Service Feed Co. v. City of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- McGrath v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Prince v. Ypsilanti Savings BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Perryman v. City Home BuildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Hann v. City of Clinton, Okl. Ex Rel. SchuetterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- City of Shawnee v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Board of County Com'rs v. City of Wewoka Ex Rel. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- City of Clinton, ex rel. Schuetter v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.